Reclaiming History? Or Re-framing Oswald?

  • Vincent Bugliosi's massive tome on the JFK assassination purports to be a "comprehensive and fair evaluation of the entire case.....The theorists may not agree with my conclusions, but in this work on the assassination I intend to set forth all of their main arguments, and the way they, not I, want them to be set forth, before I seek to demonstrate their invalidity. I will not knowingly omit or distort anything."

    We beg to differ. Judge for yourself.

Selected Posts

Also of Interest

Blog powered by Typepad

« Bugliosi's lawyering worse than Posner's | Main | Reply From a Conspiracy Believer »

June 17, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834203cd553ef00e0098186318833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Letter to New York Times Book Review:

Comments

Bob Druwing

*The publishers would like to note for the record that no animals were harmed during the production of this book. The horse that Mr. Bugliosi continues to beat was dead when he found it.

Hobie Jones

Bugliosi is dead on the money. The facts against Oswald are overwhelming. I am proudly in line with the minority of Americans who believe the Warren Commission, for the most part, got it right... All you conspiracy buffs......tell me Sylvia Odio is/was (do it without looking her up)? If you know her story...then maybe I'll accept that you at least know the facts.

The comments to this entry are closed.